
Have a look at this amazing Efijy Concept from Holden, clearly a reminiscent of 1940s design, however given a twist of modernity and explicit proportions, even Ferrari spells no match in what this mere Holden could pleasure your very eyes once laid upon. How come styling of the 40s would turn out so 'modern' or a better word so 'fashionably delightful' in our times? Whereas something from the 90s will definitely be a sure 'no no' for us 21st century beings. This all, comes down to the very DNA that each design carries. 1950s is definitely an improvement of 1940s, where during then, anyone still lugging around in a 1940 handbag or car is definitely one that's regarded as 'outdated', same goes 1960s vs 1950s and so on.
However, when things evolve their way into a stage where it carries no identifiable genes from something a couple of decades ago, things starts to get interesting, as there's visibly 'NO IMPROVEMENT' that could be detected by the very eye, it would therefore seems as if its not something of being 'lesser' compared to 'modern' ones.
This is where the word 'Classics' would then fill the vocabulary measures more appropriately than 'old' or 'outdated'; then came upon efforts to revive the nostalgic factor.
Think about it, a 20 year old abandoned building next to your house might be an eyesore. And that's exactly what Egyptians felt 4594 years ago, 20 years after the Great Piramid of Giza (Khufu) was left abandoned after the falling of the Khufu empire - A mere 'eye sore' for Egyptians that felt it's just an 'outdated' building.












1 comment:
now thats what i call desirability!
Post a Comment
Why just read? Post your comments. Don't be selfish. Cheers!